Tuesday, April 2, 2013

A tale between two learning models: Part II


In A tale between two learning models, Part I, I mentioned I would share a conversation I had with 2nd grade elementary teacher, Ms. Stephanie Cerda, about her experience implementing the Design Thinking process.  Since hearing about the concept design thinking, at SXSWedu I have been intrigued to find out more.  Stephanie agreed to discuss her yearlong journey of teaching her kids how to design their thinking as well as how she got started.  You can visit our Google Hangout here.

I first set out to discuss how design thinking can be integrated into a project based learning model.  However, after we started talking, the design thinking concept took center stage.  Don't get me wrong, the Project Based Learning model does have it's place.  Ms. Cerda commented that the project based learning model has great qualities about it.  In fact, she mentioned that her school uses project based learning in first grade and decided to implement design thinking in second.  She provided and example of her own child who attends her school.  He was completing a lesson modeled after PBL covering the city of London.  As she talked with him about his project, she realized how knowledgeable he was of this topic.  In fact, he created a replica of the city.  She asked him if his research was before or after London hosted the Olympics.  After further research, her son realized all his information was about London before they hosted the Olympics.  This didn't diminish the important work and understanding that went into his project.  Ms. Cerda explained his PBL had great qualities such as research skills, prototyping, retell and engagement.  He truly loved this topic, worked hard and produced an exceptional model of London.  However, this became an opportunity to open up further learning from this realization that what he learned was limited.

Our conversation led to how valuable design thinking strategies can really help to fill in the missing ingredient to this already fabulous project Ms. Cerda's son created.  Below, are a few observations explained.

Taking time to reflect back on our learning in order to relearn:
  • We tend to move on instead of taking more time to reflect back on misconceptions or to gain more insight on existing understanding.  Ms. Cerda's conversation with her son led to a probing question about London, "How has London changed after hosting the Olympics?"  This led to another question, "How does a city change when they host the Olympics?".  This, in turn, led to a question he is working to answer, "How would the city of Austin change if it hosted the Olympics?".  Ms. Cerda explained how he researched all sports in the Olympics to see what places within the Austin area could host these events and how traffic could be handled.  From this, he could construct a model of Austin using his research, thereby constructing new knowledge and working to solve his own problem.  He took his learning a step further, tweaking it along the way.  This couldn't have been done had he not reflected back on the initial project.  We as teacher's have an important role in facilitating these types of conversations.

Creating a mindset to keep asking your own essential questions:
  • Too often students are given a set of guidelines from which their learning is to take place.  Design thinking creates a mindset within learners to keep asking questions.  The learning is designed to create curiosity and shoot for deeper thinking and understanding.  As Ms. Cerda explained, design thinking strategies help her students "learn how to create essential questions."
Both project based learning and design thinking are needed. Ms. Cerda and I agreed that both models overlap in certain areas.  While project based learning can be very involved, it sets a research base for Ms. Cerda's younger kiddos.  It provides choice, relates to real life situations, evaluation methods are thoughtfully built around targeted objectives, rich in research, involves prototyping, and utilizes authentic audiences to explore reflection.

We also discussed the value of design thinking.  Ms. Cerda really complimented design thinking because it works to build problem finders and focuses on higher order thinking.  Concepts can be critically analyzed and developed starting with generative topics.  This process is perfect for addressing types of questions and solving complex problems.  Questions and problems the students actually build and solve themselves.  Ms. Cerda mentioned how she noticed her students developing a sense of empathy through this process.  More importantly, she noticed how her kids understand how failing and taking risks is a part of their learning.  This is where tweaking their approach, just like her son did, really fosters deeper learning.

There is nothing more valuable than one teacher sharing an experience with another.  I appreciate Ms. Cerda sharing her experiences to help me, and hopefully others, begin a journey with design thinking.  With this in mind, I couldn't help mentioning a TEDxTeen talk by Tara Suri and Niha Jain who's talk entitled, "Learning to Fail", really struck me as, what seems to me, a great example of my impression of design thinking in action.